Legislative and Policy analysis and recommendations for reform
Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases / 2015; 5 (3): 110-113
JMID, doi: 10.5799/ahinjs.02.2015.03.0187
Djibuti et al. BMC Public Health (2015) 15:427 DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1760-z
Original Article
SAGE Open Medicine Volume 5: 1–7 © The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav httpDs:O//dIo: i1.o0r.g1/107.171/2770/52035013212171773311977 journals.sagepub.com/home/smo
Analytical Report
Almaty 2015
Accessed: 26.09.2019
Bishkek 2015
Accessed: 26.09.2019
PLOS Medicine | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002462 November 28, 2017
J Epidemiol Community Health 2011;65:1166e1170. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.097469
F1000Research 2019, 8:323 Last updated: 17 MAY 2019
UNAIDS 2014 | Guidance Note
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183180 October 9, 2017
Journal of Infection and Public Health 12 (2019) 213–223
Practical Guidance for collaborative interventions
Guidelines
Key Populations
This study addresses part of the Terms of Reference for a scoping report ‘An analysis of approaches to laboratory capacity strengthening for drug resistant infections in low and middle income countries’. It has been produced as a separate report because it is also very relevant for a second stud...y ‘Supporting Surveillance Capacity for Antimicrobial Resistance: Regional Networks and Educational Resources’. This study compares antimicrobial surveillance systems in three low and middle income countries in order to describe the components of these systems and to understand which surveillance models are best suited to particular contexts. Ghana, Nigeria and Nepal were selected as study countries because they cover different continents and include one ‘fragile’ context (Nigeria). Brief information from Malawi is also included.
more